United Nations Publishes Study on Gap Between The Rich And The Poor in Africa.
Aerial View Of Housing Inequality in Cape Town. Image via waronwant.org
(New York) It is only by addressing the challenge of income inequality that African countries can achieve decisive progress towards poverty reduction and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), according to the United Nations Development Programme’s (UNDP) study on Income Inequality Trends in sub-Saharan Africa: Divergence, Determinants, and Consequences. The publication, the first of its kind on Africa, was officially launched during a high-level event on the margins of the 72nd session of the United Nations General Assembly.
The pioneering new study on income inequality on the continent says that the widest gaps in income between the rich and the poor in Africa are to be found in five southern African nations, as well as the Comores and the Central African Republic. It names the southern African nations where income inequality is worst as being South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia and Lesotho.
The launch was hosted by Mr. Abdoulaye Mar Dieye, UN Assistant Secretary-General, UNDP Assistant Administrator and Regional Director for Africa. In attendance were H.E. President Roch Marc Christian Kaboré President of Burkina Faso; H.E. Pravind Jugnauth Prime Minister of the Republic of Mauritius; H.E. Mrs. Hirut Zemene, State Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Ethiopia, and Dr. Mukhisa Kituyi, UNCTAD Secretary-General.
The study indicates that in spite of solid economic progress over the last 25 years, illustrated by robust GDP growth of about 5.0 percent, poverty level remains very high in Africa – 41 percent compared to other developing regions. It further adds that although sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) achieved an average reduction in its unweighted Gini coefficient—from about 0.47 to 0.43 between 1991 and 2011— the region remains one of the most unequal in the world – with 10 its counties listed among the 19 most unequal in the world.
According to the study, income inequality in African countries stems from a highly dualistic economic structure, where high income sectors, such as multinational companies and the extractive sector, offer limited capacity to generate employment compared to the informal sector, and where most of the workforce earns far lower incomes; a high concentration of physical capital, human capital, and land, especially in Eastern and Southern Africa; and the limited distributive capacity of the State, which often manifests in a ‘natural resource curse’, an urban bias of public policy, and ethnic and gender inequalities.
The Study assert that seven outlier countries leading the continent in income inequality are all marked by the concentration of land and socio-economic assets in the hands of a few. On the contrary Countries like Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Burundi, and Guinea, which are characterized by egalitarian access to land for productive engagement, especially in agriculture, appear to be performing better and rank among the most equal in the world,” it says.
In addition the study says that the inequality in southern and central African countries where the oil and mining sectors are important is getting worse, while the gap between rich and poor is narrowing in countries where agriculture dominates - mostly in west Africa.
Highlighting the timeliness of the study, the UNDP Regional Director for Africa said: “The book helps to crystalize the indivisibility of the SDGs and the centrality of addressing low income inequality in accelerating the achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and in helping operationalize SDG 10 in Africa”.
Warning that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing income disparities in the region, the authors of the book recommend a series of target policy approaches aimed at:
▪ Improving distribution of human capital (particularly secondary education) to positively affect inequality;
▪ Increasing direct taxation and efficiency of tax administration, as well as increasing well-targeted social expenditures;
▪ Enhancing productivity in the agricultural sector, which is seen as key to reallocating labour to other sectors of the economy and reducing rural poverty, rural poverty gaps, and income inequality; and
▪ Implementing structural transformation.
“The key message from the book is that there is no silver bullet for addressing inequality in the continent. You have to take countries’ context into consideration and realize that policies that accelerate the reduction of poverty may not necessarily be the same policy that reduces inequality.” said Ayodele Odusola, Head of Strategy and Analysis and Chief Economist for UNDP Africa, and lead editor of the study.
Planting the seeds of equity
Urging African policymakers to “plant and nurture the seeds of equity” the study recommends a far-reaching development strategy, symbolized by a Tree of Equity. Its 4 main ‘branches’ (population, macro-economic fundamentals, human development, and growth) are intended to facilitate Africa’s demographic transition; the adoption of macroeconomic policies to reverse deindustrialization; and greater productivity in the informal sector.
Income Inequality Trends in sub-Saharan Africa: Divergence, Determinants, and Consequences, was co-edited by Ayodele Odusola, Head of Strategy and Analysis and Chief Economist for UNDP Africa; Professor Andrea Giovanni Cornia of the University of Florence; Professor Haroon Bhorat of the University of Cape Town; and Pedro Conceicao, Director of Strategic Policy at UNDP’s Bureau for Policy and Programme Support.
Story Culled From undp.org.
Written By IWN News Online Editor.
Like Or Follow Us On Our Social Media Pages.
Write Or Contribute An Article/Opinion For Us.
To Join The Conversation On This Site
Register To Leave Your Comments Below.
Source : IWN Online Editor
You might be interested in:
LEAVE A COMMENT 0 comments
Comments that are judged to be defamatory, abusive or in bad taste are not acceptable and contributors who consistently fall below certain criteria will be permanently blacklisted.Comments must be concise and to be point.The moderator will not enter into debate with individual contributor and the moderator's decision is final.The comment facility will be removed after 48 hours.